
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments: The Wall Street Journal reported Monday that Mr. Trump had told aides he'd be willing to end the war on Iran even without wresting control of the Strait of Hormuz from Tehran, which is blocking vessels it deems linked to the U.S. or Israel and imposing hefty fees on some other ships to transit the strait. According to the Journal, Mr. Trump and his aides have recently come to the conclusion that a military operation to force Iran to reopen the key shipping lane would likely extend the war beyond his stated timeline of up to six weeks. Analysts have warned that while the U.S. does not rely significantly on energy imports from the Persian Gulf, due to the global nature of gas and oil markets a prolonged closure of the Strait of Hormuz is likely to keep prices elevated for American consumers.
Comments: Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Gen. Dan Caine, Joint Chiefs Chairman, declared at a news conference on Tuesday "the upcoming days will be decisive" in the war with Iran. "Iran knows that, and there's almost nothing they can militarily do about it," Hegseth claimed. The Defense Secretary said that "American firepower is only increasing," while saying Iran's is "decreasing." "Just one month in — only one month — we set the terms," Hegseth said. President Trump told CBS News' Weijia Jiang Tuesday morning that he is not ready "quite yet" to abandon a bid to force Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. Mr. Trump reiterated his frustration that other countries had not sent military assets to join the U.S.-Israeli war against Iran, saying "countries have to come in and take care of it." Hegseth said "if Iran is wise, it will cut a deal." He said the president is willing to make a deal, and the terms of the deal are known to the Iranians. If not, Hegseth said the U.S. "will continue with even more intensity." Caine said "our joint force continues to focus on our military objectives as we systematically continue to degrade and destroy Iran's ability to project power and threaten stability beyond its borders." Caine reiterated that the U.S. remains focused on destroying Iran's ballistic missile and Unmanned Aircraft Systems capabilities, along with the programs' supply chains. Hegseth kicked off the briefing by describing a visit over the weekend with troops fighting in Operation Epic Fury, calling the trip "an honor."
Comments: This is what others think of us: THE MOST PATHETIC DIASPORA https://www.instagram.com/reel/DWP05FkAmP_/
Comments: Iran plays Costa Rica tomorrow at 6AM PST. This is probably Iran's last match before they depart for their camp in Arizona and play closed door games before the WC starts. Today Infantino was quoted saying "We want Iran to play, Iran will play at the World Cup. There is no plan B, C or D - there is plan A," BTW, the bookies have no odds for the game tomorrow
Comments: Spain closes off its airspace to US planes involved in the Iran warMADRID (AP) — Spain closed its airspace to U.S. planes involved in the Iran war, officials said Monday, in another step by Europe’s loudest critic of U.S. and Israeli military actions in the monthlong conflict. The country earlier said that the U.S. couldn't use jointly operated military bases in the war, which Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez has described as illegal, reckless and unjust. Defense Minister Margarita Robles said that the same logic applied to the use of Spanish airspace. “This was made perfectly clear to the American military and forces from the very beginning. Therefore, neither the bases are authorized, nor, of course, is the use of Spanish airspace authorized for any actions related to the war in Iran,” Robles told reporters, describing the conflict as “profoundly illegal and profoundly unjust.” Sánchez has called on the U.S., Israel and Iran to end the war. “You cannot respond to one illegality with another, because that’s how humanity’s great disasters begin," he said earlier this month. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said that Spain's leaders are “bragging" about cutting off its airspace, even as Washington has pledged to defend the NATO member. He said that the trans-Atlantic military alliance is useful for the U.S., because it “allows us to station troops and aircraft and weapons in parts of the world that we wouldn’t normally have bases, and that includes in much of Europe.” “But if NATO is just about us defending Europe if they’re attacked, but then denying us basing rights when we need them, that’s not a very good arrangement,” Rubio told Al Jazeera on Monday. “That’s a hard one to stay engaged in and say this is good for the United States. So all of that is going to have to be reexamined.” After Sánchez's government denied the U.S. use of the Rota and Morón military bases in southern Spain, U.S. President Donald Trump threatened to cut trade with Madrid. Washington made trade threats last year, too, when Sánchez said that his government wouldn't increase its defense spending in accordance with a deal agreed to by other NATO members following Trump's pressure. At the time, Sánchez's government said that Spain could meet its military commitments by spending 2.1% of gross domestic product on defense, instead of the 5% the rest of the 32-nation military alliance agreed upon. Sánchez also has been among the most vocal critics of Israel's actions during the war in Gaza, which has invited criticism from Israel's government on several occasions. No comment from NATO Spain's new decision against a NATO ally is rare, though not unprecedented. NATO didn't comment, referring questions to national authorities. "NATO allies operate with a presumption of cooperation, but of course they retain sovereignty,'' said Daniel Baer, director of the Europe Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and a former U.S. ambassador to the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe. In an incident that strained trans-Atlantic ties, France and Italy blocked the U.S. military from using their airspace for an operation targeting Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi in 1986. In 2003, NATO member Turkey refused to allow American troops to use its territory to invade Iraq, though it did allow overflights. France and Germany firmly opposed that war, but allowed U.S. and British fighter jets to fly over their airspace. France’s then foreign minister, Dominique de Villepin, despite a famed U.N. speech against the Bush administration’s plans to invade, told the French parliament at the time that “there are practices between allies that exist that we must respect, including overflight rights.” Europe between a rock and a hard place Spain's decision reflects broader concerns among traditional U.S. partners since Trump returned to office. “The relationship with the U.S. was already strained,” Baer said. “Allies can generally be counted on, but they can’t be taken for granted.” Still, he's doubtful that other European countries would follow Spain's example. "Most Europeans are focused on keeping some measure of U.S. cooperation in supporting Ukraine, so I think it’s less likely that others join, even as they voice concerns about a lack of clarity around U.S. strategic objectives in Iran,'' he said.
Comments: Student shoots a teacher and then fatally shoots himself at a Texas high school, authorities sayAdd Yahoo as a preferred source to s
Comments: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HEq_ct4aoAADhZ8?format=jpg&name=small
Comments:
Comments:
Comments:
Comments: And in the middle of this Turkey is selling massive amounts of gold for cash to boost their economy. I suppose less Iranians spending their money over there.
Comments: There is absolutely no trust. Against international law, and by definition a war crime, USA attacked in the middle of negotiations conducted in good faith (as admitted even by USA). So, no negotiation now and probably only when IRI is good and ready. Eventually (not right now and when IRI is ready) both Iran and USA will want to talk. The problem is the third party who does not want an off ramp and instead wants total destruction. The problem here is that USA is a total hostage to the third party with a lead who is mentally ill. So, do the math.
Comments: All we need is another mozdoor and loser political group.
Comments: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJ1ua4UznUU
Comments: https://www.maryam-rajavi.com/execution-pmoi-members-mohammad-taghavi-akbar-daneshvarkar-ncri/
Comments: There is zero trust between the two parties. One agreement was thrown out, two others were ongoing before it was halted due to attacks. Why would anyone start a new one? It seems both sides are trying to control the narrative. While people and economy are suffering, they would like to see themselves as winners. There are no winners! Over a month of this and there is no sign of winning, only losing! Thousands dead, billions wasted, billions destroyed and we are looking for a winner! Fuck war…
Comments: Marco Rubio tells Al Jazeera Trump prefers diplomacy
Comments: Yet another strategy that Iran had warned it would do and we thought it was bluff. IMO, all because of Israeli misinformation campaign, and of course the President of United states' lack of qualifications to hold his job (also true for people around him) and his inept politics. How this rebel group complicates the Iran war for the U.S.
Comments: Trump tries to conjure a new reality as Iran war hits one-month fork in roadThe best estimate of many Iran experts is that while many top clerical and military leaders have perished, the regime previously decentralized power to ensure it could survive high-profile assassinations and still appears to be controlled by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. Trump’s blend of hyperbole and misdirection makes it hard to know whether he’s trying to create a diplomatic breakthrough or a justification for more intense military action.
Comments: I have talked to some of these people. And my friends, hold on to your hats. These people have so much hate in them that will make them support for nuking Iran. It is very scary where some of these people are in their heads. There is no concern for millions dying. They just want to say that they won-at any cost!
|
| < Previous 20 | Next 20 > |